Learn to critically evaluate the science behind skincare claims. Understand sample sizes, placebo controls, statistical significance, and how to spot marketing tricks.
Every day, skincare brands throw around phrases like "clinically proven" and "dermatologist tested." But what do these claims actually mean? A 2023 analysis found that over 70% of "clinical" claims in cosmetic advertising either misrepresent study findings or cite studies with significant methodological flaws. Learning to read clinical studies yourself is the single best way to cut through marketing noise and make informed decisions about what you put on your skin.
How many participants were studied? Larger samples = more reliable results.
Was there a placebo control? Was it blinded? These determine validity.
Is the result real or just random chance? P-values tell the story.
Who paid for the study? Company-funded studies have inherent biases.
Sample size (often written as n=) refers to the number of participants in a study. This is one of the most critical factors in determining whether a study's results can be trusted and applied broadly.
"In a clinical study, 90% of participants showed
improvement."
Sounds impressive, right? But if that study only had 10
participants, that's just 9 people. The same "90%" from a 200-person
study (180 people) would be far more meaningful.
Always look for the actual sample size.
A placebo-controlled study is the gold standard because it accounts for the placebo effect—the phenomenon where participants improve simply because they believe they're receiving treatment. In skincare, this effect can be significant: just using any moisturizer can improve skin appearance temporarily.
Randomized Controlled Trial — The gold standard. Participants randomly assigned to treatment or control groups.
Lab/Cell Studies — Tests on cells in a dish. Useful but doesn't guarantee results on actual skin.
Studies on Living Subjects — Tests on actual humans (or animals). More relevant than in vitro.
Studies on Excised Tissue — Tests on donated human skin samples. Bridge between lab and human studies.
Many cosmetic claims come from open-label, single-arm studies where participants know they're using the product and there's no comparison group. These studies can show improvement, but you can't know if the product caused it—or if any moisturizer would have done the same.
Statistical significance tells us whether observed results are likely real or just due to random chance. It does NOT tell us whether the effect is meaningful or large enough to matter.
The p-value indicates the probability that the results occurred by chance. In scientific research:
"Is this result real?"
Tells you whether the effect is likely genuine vs. random chance.
A result with p<0.05 is considered statistically significant.
"Does this result matter?"
Tells you whether the effect is large enough to be meaningful. A
2% wrinkle reduction might be statistically significant but
clinically meaningless.
A study might find a "statistically significant 3% increase in skin hydration." Sounds scientific, but is 3% actually noticeable? Probably not. Always ask: Is the effect size meaningful in the real world? Look for studies that report effect sizes, confidence intervals, or percentage improvements that actually matter.
Skincare marketing has developed sophisticated ways to make products sound more scientific than they are. Here are the most common tactics:
A 12-week study might show improvement at week 4, plateauing at week 8, and regression at week 12. The marketing will only mention the week 4 results.
What to look for: Full study duration results, not just "best moment" snapshots.
"92% of women agreed their skin looked younger." This is not clinical data—it's asking people if they liked a product they were given for free.
What to look for: Objective measurements (TEWL, corneometry, expert grading, imaging analysis).
"Increases collagen production by 200%"—in a petri dish. Lab results on isolated cells don't guarantee the ingredient penetrates skin or works the same way in living tissue.
What to look for: Human clinical trials, not just in vitro cell studies.
Studies on pure retinol at 1% concentration don't apply to a product with 0.01% retinol in a formula that may not deliver it effectively.
What to look for: Studies on the actual finished product, not just the ingredient.
"50% improvement in wrinkle depth" could mean going from 0.2mm to 0.1mm—technically accurate but invisible to the naked eye.
What to look for: Absolute numbers and whether changes are perceptible.
Free database of biomedical literature. Search for ingredients + "clinical trial."
Broad academic search. Look for open-access versions of papers.
Registry of clinical studies. See ongoing and completed trials.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses—the highest level of evidence.
Sample size matters—be skeptical of studies with fewer than 30 participants
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard
Statistical significance ≠ clinical significance—effect size matters
Always check who funded the study and where it was published
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. For specific skincare concerns, consult with a board-certified dermatologist. Information presented reflects current scientific understanding as of the publication date.
Continue building your evidence-based skincare knowledge
Retinol vs Retinal vs Tretinoin: Understanding the evidence behind each.
The most versatile molecule in skincare—what the research actually shows.
L-Ascorbic vs THD vs MAP: Comparing the clinical evidence.
Take our science-based quiz for ingredient recommendations tailored to your skin.
Take the Skincare Quiz